The Quality Grade That Follows Your Developer's Name: How BCA's CONQUAS Bands Read a Track Record
At the May 2023 launch of Singapore's construction-quality banding, 20 property developers and 15 builders sat in the top tier, Band 1, and no firm sat in the bottom tier, Band 6. That single line captures the shift the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) has been driving
At the May 2023 launch of Singapore's construction-quality banding, 20 property developers and 15 builders sat in the top tier, Band 1, and no firm sat in the bottom tier, Band 6. That single line captures the shift the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) has been driving for a homebuyer: the quality of the hands that built your home is no longer a specialist's number buried in an assessment file. It is a public grade, and it travels with the developer's name into the next launch.
Three years on, the register has grown, and moved. BCA's Quality Housing Portal today lists 175 developers and 112 builders, of which 124 developers and 85 builders currently carry a band, across 170 banded private residential projects. This article sets out what the grade measures, how to read it, and, below, the full register of every banded developer, builder and project as the portal showed it at its 1 July 2026 update.
What CONQUAS actually is
The Construction Quality Assessment System, CONQUAS, was introduced by BCA in 1989 as a standard way to score the workmanship quality of a building project at the point of inspection. It has been a requirement for new buildings on Government Land Sales sites since 1992, and for public-sector projects with contract values above S$5 million since 1998 (BCA, via Home & Decor Singapore). Over three decades it has become the reference benchmark for how well a building was actually put together, as opposed to how it was marketed.
Crucially, CONQUAS assesses build quality, the finish, the installation, the watertightness, not the design, the location, or the price. A high band tells you the developer's projects tend to be built with few major defects. It does not tell you whether a project is good value.
Three components add up to one score
For projects with construction tenders called from 1 July 2023 onwards, the assessment is built from three components (BCA official CONQUAS page):
Published by haio Research on haio.sg — Singapore property analysis built on official URA, HDB and data.gov.sg records.
Read this article with its live charts at https://haio.sg/news/conquas-bands-developer-track-record-complete-register/
Internal Finishes, mainly architectural finishes such as floors, internal walls, ceilings, doors, windows and components, plus basic mechanical & electrical (M&E) fittings.
Installation Methods Verification and Functional Tests, covering four trades: waterproofing to bathrooms and toilets; stone and tiling installation; timber floor installation; and window installation, with tests on window water-tightness, wet-area water-tightness and the adhesion of internal wall tiles.
External Finishes, roofs, external walls and external works, assessed at building completion.
The sum of the three components gives the CONQUAS score, which is then used to derive the CONQUAS band for a private residential project. BCA notes that specific component weightings vary by building type and are set out in the CONQUAS manual, so the exact split is not a single fixed ratio across all projects.
Why BCA replaced raw scores with Bands 1 to 6
Until May 2023, a project carried a raw CONQUAS score, points summed across the assessed works into one total. BCA replaced that with a banding system after homebuyer feedback that a bare score was not intuitive for comparison when making a purchase decision (BCA, reported 30 May 2023, Home & Decor Singapore).
The band scale runs from Band 1 to Band 6:
Band 1, a very low incidence rate of major defects; an exemplary track record.
Bands 1 and 2, reserved for firms that have consistently delivered projects with little or no major defects.
Band 3, an average incidence of major defects.
Band 6, the poorest track record on the scale (BCA's portal legend: "very high incidence of major defects").
"Major defects" here mean problems that affect functionality and liveability. BCA's own examples are inter-floor water seepage in wet areas, water seepage through windows, and popping tiles, the kind of faults an owner lives with, not cosmetic blemishes. Where such defects are found, BCA notes they must be rectified by the developer and builder.
How to read a developer's band before you buy
Two things are worth understanding about how the band is formed.
First, a firm's band is a track record, not a single-project verdict. Developer and builder bandings are determined from their CONQUAS performance across projects completed over the past six years, together with validated feedback on major defects. So a developer's band reflects a pattern of delivery, which is arguably more useful to a buyer than any one building's number. In the register below, the "CONQUAS projects on record" column shows exactly that pattern, in BCA's own notation, "4 (1)" means four Band 1 projects.
Second, the bands are public and searchable, and they move. BCA's Quality Housing Portal is refreshed monthly as new assessments land, and the six-year window rolls forward. A developer's grade today can differ from the grade it carried at any past launch, in either direction. The register below is therefore a dated snapshot, and the live portal is always the authoritative source.
The launch snapshot, and how much has already moved
At the banding's introduction, the reported placements included (Straits Times reporting, via Home & Decor Singapore, 30 May 2023):
Developer / firm (noted project)
Reported band at May 2023 launch
City Developments Limited (CDL)
Band 1 (among 20 developers)
Woh Hup (builder)
Band 1 (among 15 builders)
EL Development (Blossoms By The Park)
Band 3
Far East Organization (The Reserve Residences)
Band 4
IOI Group (The Trilinq)
Band 5
No firm
Band 6
Compare that with the portal's current register (1 July 2026 update, full tables below) and the movement is real, in both directions:
Far East Organization, reported Band 4 at launch; Band 1 today, with two Band 1 projects on the current record.
EL Development, Band 3 at launch; Band 4 today.
IOI, Band 5 at launch on the back of The Trilinq (completed 2017). That project has since aged out of the rolling six-year window; the name appears on the portal today only as IOI Properties Group, "Under Assessment", no current band at all.
CDL, Band 1 then and now, with 11 Band 1 projects on the current record, the deepest Band 1 track record of any developer.
Woh Hup, builder Band 1 then and now; all 14 of its banded projects sit in Band 1.
Where the launch had no Band 6 firm, today's register has two Band 6 developers and one Band 6 builder.
The lesson for a buyer: never quote a band from an old article, including this one. Bands recompute as projects complete, age out, and as homeowner defect feedback is validated.
The full register, every banded developer, builder and project
Compiled by haio from BCA's Quality Housing Portal: we queried the portal's own compare tool for each of the 175 developers and 112 builders on its roster, and the portal's band search for every project band. Retrieved 6 July 2026; the portal states "Last Updated: 1 July 2026". Every band below is BCA's published figure, nothing is estimated or inferred. Bands change monthly; check the live portal before acting on any single row.
Summary as at the portal's 1 July 2026 update:
Select a column heading to sort.
Band 1
32
14
57
Band 2
39
27
44
Band 3
19
12
21
Band 4
22
16
27
Band 5
10
15
19
Band 6
2
1
2
Banded total
124
85
170
Select a column heading to sort.
Under assessment
33
21
Under assessment / not banded (mixed)
2
1
Not banded
16
5
Portal roster total
175
112
Notation: "3 (1), 1 (2)" = three Band 1 projects and one Band 2 project on the firm's six-year record. Markers `^ @ # *` are BCA's defect-feedback flags, legend at the end of the register.
Under assessment (not yet banded), 33 developers: ABN Holdings Pte Ltd; Alibaba Group Holding Ltd; Bohai Investments (Sengkang) Pte Ltd; Centra Novena Pte Ltd; DB2Land Pte Ltd; Ekovest Development (S) Pte Ltd; Euro Properties; Ever Capital Pte Ltd; FRX Capital Pte Ltd; Forsea Holdings Pte Ltd; Fraxtor Singapore; Hong How Land Pte Ltd; IOI Properties Group; JLCC Development Pte Ltd; Jinmac Pte Ltd; KY Group; Kai Lim Developments Pte Ltd; Kimen Group; Kims Land @ EC Pte Ltd; LSZ International Pte Ltd; Lee Foundation; Obsidian Development Pte Ltd; Polarix Cultural & Science Park Investment Pte Ltd; Precise Development Pte Ltd; Primest Land Pte Ltd; Santarli Group Pte Ltd; Sinarmas Land; Sunlit Venture Capital Pte Ltd; Tan Chwee Boon Pte Ltd; The Place Holdings Ltd; Victory Land Pte Ltd; ZACD Group Ltd; Zelitist Pte Ltd.
Under assessment / not banded (mixed record), 2 developers: Amara Holdings Ltd; Sim Lian Group.
Not banded (no CONQUAS assessment taken up, or withdrawn, "quality performance unknown", per BCA's own legend), 16 developers: Aylesbury Pte Ltd; Centra East Development Pte Ltd; Cluny Development Pte Ltd; Fortune Realty Pte Ltd; Grow99 Pte Ltd; Hullet Development Pte Ltd; JVA Venture Pte Ltd; KTC Group; LR Properties Pte Ltd; Lakeview Investments Pte Ltd; Lum Chang Group; Pinnacle Assets Pte Ltd; SC Global Developments Ltd; Sunstone Properties (Pasir Panjang) Pte Ltd; TG Development Pte Ltd; Three Sixty-Nine Development Pte Ltd.
Builders by band
Band 1, 14 builders
Select a column heading to sort.
Asiabuild Construction Pte Ltd
(1)
1 (1)
China Construction (South Pacific) Development Co Pte Ltd
(1)
6 (1), 1 (2), 1 (3), 11 (Under Assessment)
China Jingye Engineering Corporation Ltd (Spore Branch)
(1)^
1 (1), 1 (2)#, 1 (Under Assessment)
Dragages Singapore Pte Ltd
(1)
4 (1), 1 (2), 1 (Under Assessment)
Kajima Overseas Asia (Singapore) Pte Ltd
(1)
1 (1), 1 (2)
Keong Hong Construction Pte Ltd
(1)
2 (1), 1 (2)
Kim Seng Heng Engineering Construction (Pte) Ltd
(1)
2 (1)
MCC Engineering (Singapore) Pte Ltd
(1)
2 (1), 3 (Under Assessment)
Newcon Builders Pte Ltd
(1)
1 (1)
SB Procurement Pte Ltd
(1)
1 (1)
Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co Ltd
(1)
1 (1)
TPS Construction Pte Ltd
(1)
2 (1), 1 (2), 1 (Under Assessment)
Band 2, 27 builders
Select a column heading to sort.
CES Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd
(2)
1 (2)
China Construction Realty Co. Pte Ltd
(2)
1 (2), 1 (3), 2 (Under Assessment)
Chip Eng Seng Contractors (1988) Pte Ltd
(2)
1 (2)
CNQC Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd
(2)
1 (1), 3 (2)
Fu Xiang Construction Pte Ltd
(2)
1 (2)
Greatearth Construction Pte Ltd
(2)
1 (2)
HLBC Pte Ltd
(2)
1 (2), 1 (3), 4 (Under Assessment)
JH Construction Pte Ltd
(2)
1 (1), 1 (3)
Band 3, 12 builders
Select a column heading to sort.
ABM Construction Pte Ltd
(3)
1 (3)
Calypso Construction Management Pte Ltd
(3)
2 (2), 1 (3)
Daiya Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd
(3)
1 (3), 1 (Not Banded)
Guan Xing Pte Ltd
(3)
1 (3)
HLX Building Engineering Pte Ltd
(3)
1 (3)
Hua Leong Group Pte Ltd
(3)
1 (3), 1 (4)
Lim Wen Heng Construction Pte Ltd
(3)
1 (3), 2 (Under Assessment), 1 (Not Banded)
Low Keng Huat (Singapore) Ltd
(3)
1 (3), 1 (4)
Nakano Singapore (Pte) Ltd
(3)
1 (2), 2 (3), 2 (Under Assessment)
Seah Construction Pte Ltd
(3)
1 (2), 2 (4), 1 (Under Assessment)
Seong Construction Pte Ltd
(3)
1 (3)
Trust-Build Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd
(3)
1 (3)
Band 4, 16 builders
Select a column heading to sort.
Chan Rong Fen Building Construction Pte Ltd
(4)
1 (4), 1 (Not Banded)
Cheng Ji Builder Pte Ltd
(4)
1 (4), 1 (Under Assessment)
CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd
(4)
1 (3), 1 (4)
Evan Lim & Co Pte Ltd
(4)
1 (2), 1 (5), 1 (Under Assessment)
He Zhan Construction Pte Ltd
(4)
1 (4)
Iso-team Corporation Pte Ltd
(4)
1 (4)
Lian Soon Construction Pte Ltd
(4)
1 (4)
LS Construction Pte Ltd
(4)^
1 (4)#
Lum Chang Interior Pte Ltd
(4)
1 (4)
NB Development Pte Ltd
(4)
1 (4), 1 (Under Assessment)
SG United Construction Pte Ltd
(4)
1 (4)
Star Engineering Pte Ltd
(4)
1 (4)
Thian Sung Construction Pte Ltd
(4)
1 (4)
Tokyu Construction Co Ltd
(4)
Band 5, 15 builders
Select a column heading to sort.
Anchorage Construction Co Pte Ltd
(5)
2 (5)
Bestlink Construction Pte Ltd
(5)
1 (5), 1 (6), 1 (Under Assessment)
Dynamicwerkz Pte Ltd
(5)
1 (4), 1 (5), 1 (Under Assessment)
East Asia Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd
(5)
1 (5), 1 (Under Assessment)
HES Construction Pte Ltd
(5)
1 (5)
Hiap Seng Building Construction Pte Ltd
(5)
1 (5), 2 (Under Assessment)
JG Builders Pte Ltd
(5)
1 (5)
Nippon Builders Pte Ltd
(5)
1 (5), 1 (Under Assessment)
Pal-Link Construction Pte Ltd
(5)
2 (4), 1 (5)
Seah Kim Cheok Construction Co Pte Ltd
(5)
1 (5), 1 (Not Banded)
Sheng Yue Construction Pte Ltd
(5)
1 (5)
Solid Decoration Pte Ltd
(5)
1 (5)
Sysma Construction Pte Ltd
(5)
Band 6, 1 builder
Builder
Band
CONQUAS projects on record
Vista Engineers & Construction Pte Ltd
(6)
1 (6)
Under assessment (not yet banded), 21 builders: 165@Loyang Pte Ltd; As-Is Builders Pte Ltd; Boon Tian Contractor Pte Ltd; CPC Construction Pte Ltd; China Communications Construction Co Ltd (Singapore Branch); China Harbour Engineering Co Ltd Singapore Branch; China Railway Construction Group Corporation Limited (Singapore branch); Construkt Pte Ltd; Dal Builders Pte Ltd; Forsea Holdings Pte Ltd; Grandcrest Construction Pte Ltd; Grandtech Construction Pte Ltd; Hexacon Construction Pte Ltd; Hock Guan Cheong Builder Pte Ltd; ID 212 Pte Ltd; Innobuild Contractor Pte Ltd; Leadbuild Construction Pte Ltd; Lum Chang Building Contractors Pte Ltd; Santarli Construction Pte Ltd; Sim Lian Construction Co (Pte) Ltd; Y-5G Builders Pte Ltd.
Under assessment / not banded (mixed record), 1 builder: S&L City Builders Pte Ltd.
Not banded (no CONQUAS assessment taken up, or withdrawn, "quality performance unknown", per BCA's own legend), 5 builders: Chong Tong Construction Pte Ltd; Paul Y Construction (S) Pte Ltd; Precise Development Pte Ltd; Sinotac Builder's (S) Pte Ltd; Vigcon Construction Pte Ltd.
Every banded project, 170 private residential projects
Project bands are the project's own CONQUAS performance, distinct from the developer's firm-level band above. Sorted by band, then name. "Completed" is the year shown on the portal.
Select a column heading to sort.
Reading the marks, BCA's own footnotes
The portal attaches four defect-feedback markers, reproduced verbatim:
^, "Developer/Builder had a project that has received feedback in respect of a significant number of major defects (e.g. water seepage) after the finalisation of its CONQUAS performance."
#, "The project has received feedback in respect of a significant number of major defects (e.g. water seepage) after the finalisation of its CONQUAS performance."
@, "Developer/Builder had a project that has received feedback in respect of a significant number of major defects (e.g. water seepage)."
\*, "The project has received feedback in respect of a significant number of major defects (e.g. water seepage)."
In plain terms: a band with one of these marks means validated homeowner complaints about major defects exist that the band figure itself may not yet fully reflect. Treat a marked band as a prompt to look closer, not as a technicality.
What's public, and what isn't
The bands, firm-level and project-level, are public and searchable, and the register above shows all of them as at the portal's 1 July 2026 update. What is not published is the full underlying assessment: the item-by-item CONQUAS scoring for a given building, and the specific defects logged. So the honest boundary is this: you can compare developers, builders and projects by band, and you can see whether a firm's record is strong or average, but you cannot pull a defect-by-defect report on a specific unit from the public portal.
It's also worth being explicit about what a band is not a proxy for. It says nothing about price, layout efficiency, tenure, en-bloc potential or how a project will hold its value. And a "Not Banded" entry is not a red flag by itself, BCA's own definition is that the firm or project did not take up (or withdrew from) CONQUAS assessment, so its quality performance is simply unknown. The band is a build-quality signal, one input among several, and it deserves to be weighed alongside the price and location analysis a buyer or seller is already doing.
The bottom line
For a buyer, the CONQUAS band adds a data point that used to be hard to get: an independent, government-assessed read on whether a developer tends to hand over homes with few major defects. For a seller or an owner, a developer's band is part of the story a resale unit carries with it. The register above is complete as at BCA's 1 July 2026 portal update, but bands recompute monthly on a rolling six-year window, and the launch-versus-today movements show how quickly a grade can change. The most reliable move is to use a register like this for orientation, then confirm the current band on BCA's portal for the specific developer, builder and project in question, and to treat it as what it is: a measure of construction quality, sitting next to, not instead of, the questions of price and value.
---
Sources
BCA, CONQUAS: Construction Quality Assessment System (official; assessment approach, three components, 1989 origin, 3-Tier scheme): https://www1.bca.gov.sg/safety-and-standards/construction-quality/conquas/
BCA, Quality Housing Portal (search and compare bands by property, developer and contractor; source of the full register above): https://www.bca.gov.sg/quality-housing-portal/, band-search page `ConquasBand.aspx` and firm compare tool queried for every rostered developer (175) and builder (112) on 6 July 2026; portal page states "Last Updated: 1 July 2026". Footnote legend and "Under Assessment" / "Not Banded" definitions quoted verbatim from the portal's explanatory notes.
BCA media release, 25 May 2023, "New Construction Quality Banding to help Homebuyers make Informed Choices": https://www1.bca.gov.sg/resources/newsroom/new-construction-quality-banding-to-help-homebuyers-make-informed-choices/
Home & Decor Singapore (Straits Times reporting, Joyce Lim, 30 May 2023), band scale, major-defect examples, launch portal coverage (110 developers / 76 builders / 350 projects), and launch-day developer placements: https://www.homeanddecor.com.sg/property/building-construction-authority-bca-score-scoring
Estimate only, not financial advice. A model-generated guide from public data, not a formal valuation; actual prices and bank valuations may differ, so verify before acting. haio accepts no liability for decisions made in reliance on it.